ФАКТОРНАЯ ИНТЕРВАЛЬНАЯ КОНЦЕПЦИЯ ОЦЕНКИ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ И ЗДОРОВЬЯ
https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2018-1-2-57-68
Abstract
В настоящей работе развиваются логико-вероятностный и логико-возможностный способы оценивания безопасности и обоснования здоровья в системе вида «среда — объект —
защита — субъект». В предположении о монотонности изменения эффектов действия различных вредных факторов разработана новая факторная интервальная концепция, позволяющая унифицировано описывать параметрические предпосылки происшествий с помощью интервалов восприимчивости на основе применения единой модели «воздействие — ослабление — восприимчивость». Полученные авторами зависимости для вероятностной и возможностной мер вершинных исходов позволяют рассчитывать показатели безопасности и обосновывать способы и средства защиты.
About the Authors
Ю. Есипов
Донской государственный технический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Мохаммад Джаюси
Донской государственный технический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bolotin, V.V. Statisticheskie metody v stroitel’noy mekhanike. [Statistical methods in structural mechanics.] Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1965, 324 p. (in Russian).
2. Volkov, E.B., Sudakov, R.S., Syritsin, T.A. Osnovy teorii nadezhnosti raketnykh dvigateley. [Fundamentals of the reliability theory of rocket engines.] Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1974, 344 p. (in Russian).
3. Chernyavskaya, O.A., Shadchin, A.V. Otsenka dostovernosti rascheta maloy veroyatnosti razrusheniya dlya edinichnykh konstruktsiy. [Accuracy evaluation of the calculation
4. of a small probability of destruction for a single design.] Prikladnaya matematika i mekhanika, 2010, no. 4, pp. 118-123 (in Russian).
5. Ostreykovskiy, V.A., Salnikov, N.L. Veroyatnostnoe prognozirovanie rabotosposobnosti YAEU. [Probabilistic forecasting performance of nuclear power systems.] Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1990, 316 p. (in Russian).
6. Esipov, Y.V., Samsonov, F.A., Cheremisin, A.I. Monitoring i otsenka riska system “zashchita – ob’ekt – sreda”. [Monitoring and risk assessment of systems "protection — object — environment".] Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2013, 138 p. (in Russian).
7. Makhutov, N.A. Konstruktsionnaya prochnost’, resurs i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost’. V 2 ch. [Structural strength, resource, and technogenic safety. In 2 parts.] Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005, part 1, 494 p.; part 2, 610 p. (in Russian).
8. Clir, J. Sistemologiya. Avtomatizatsiya resheniya sistemnykh zadach. [Systemology. Automation of solving system problems.] Moscow: Radio i svyaz’, 1990, 422 p. (in Russian).
9. Dyubua, D., Prad, A. Teoriya vozmozhnostey. Prilozheniya k predstavleniyu znaniy v informatike. [Theory of possibilities.
10. Annexes to the representation of knowledge in
11. computer science.] Moscow: Mir, 1989, 286 p.
12. (in Russian).
13. Esipov, Y.V., Dzhilyadzhi, M.S., Cheremisin, A.I. Logicheskoe i parametricheskoe modelirovanie predposylok i ustanovlenie mery opredelennosti realizatsii proisshestviya v sisteme.
14. [Logical and parametric modeling of the prerequisites and the establishment of a measure of the certainty of the implementation of the incident in system.] Safety in Technosphere, 2017, no. 2, pp. 3-12 (in Russian).
15. Esipov, Y.V., Dzhilyadzhi, M.S., Mamatchenko, N.S. Razrabotka algoritma rascheta veroyatnostnogo pokazatelya bezopasnosti tekhnicheskoy sistemy “zashita – ob’ekt –
16. sreda”. [Development of calculation algorithm of
17. the probability safety index of the technical system "protection - object - environment".] Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems, 2017, no. 1, pp. 76-89 (in Russian).
18. Korn, G., Korn, T. Spravochnik po matematike. Dlya nauchnykh rabotnikov i inzhinerov. [Mathematics handbook. For scientists and engineers.] Moscow: Nauka, 1974, 832 p. (in
19. Russian).
20. Egelskaya, E.V., Korotkiy, A.A. Otsenka riska chelovecheskogo faktora v sisteme “personal – pod’emnye mekhanizmy – proizvodstvennaya sreda” na predpriyatiyakh mashinostroeniya. [Risk assessment of human factor in the "personnel - lifting hoists — production environment" in
21. enterprises of mechanical engineering.] Vestnik of Don State Technical University, 2015, vol. 15, no. 1 (80), pp. 131-137 (in Russian).
22. Kiseleva, Yu.Yu., Gaponov, V.L. Povyshenie bezopasnosti truda na osnove upravleniya professional’nymi riskami. [Safety increase on the basis of professional risk management.]
23. Vestnik of Don State Technical University, 2013, vol. 13, no. 1-2 (70-71), pp. 76-85 (in Russian).
24. Martynenko, A.A., Novikov, V.V. Obosnovanie matematicheskoy modeli resheniya zadachi otsenki riskov bezopasnosti rtuda na predpriyatiyakh mashinostroeniya. [Justification of the mathematical model of solving the problem
25. of risk assessment of labour safety at the enterprises of mechanical engineering.] Vestnik of Don State Technical University, 2012, vol. 12, no. 8 (69), pp. 68-72 (in Russian).
26. Syzrantsev, V.N., Nevelov, Ya.P., Golofast, S.L. Raschet prochnostnoy nadezhnosti izdeliy na osnove metodov neparametricheskoy statistiki. [The calculation of the strength reliability of products based on the methods of nonparametric statistics.] Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2008, 218 p. (in Russian)
27. Esipov, Yu.V., Vasilchenko, Yu.I. Model’ otkazov “prochnost’ – nagruzka” pri perekryvayushchikhsya raspredeleniyakh parametrov v uslovii ikh odnostoronnego dopuska (statisticheskiy podkhod). [Failure model "strength —
28. load" with overlapping distributions of the parameters in the unilateral tolerance (statistical approach).] Nadezhnost’ i kontrol’ kachestva, 1994, no. 3, pp. 7-13 (in Russian).
29. Esipov, Yu.V., Vasilchenko, Yu.I. Model’
30. otkazov “prochnost’ – nagruzka” pri perekryvayushchikhsya raspredeleniyakh parametrov v uslovii ikh odnostoronnego dopuska (gipoteticheskiy podkhod). [Failure model "strength —
31. load" with overlapping distributions of the parameters in the unilateral tolerance (hypothetical approach).] Nadezhnost’ i kontrol’ kachestva, 1996, no. 5, pp. 27-41 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
, . Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2018;(1-2):57-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2018-1-2-57-68
Views:
134
Email this article 