ISSUES OF ANALYSIS AND PROBLEMS OF RELIABILITY OF STATISTICAL DATA ON INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS AT ENTERPRISES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Introduction. There have been some improvements in the area of occupational safety and health at Russian enterprises. However, the main challenges in this area need to be addressed urgently. Numerous cases of industrial injuries and occupational diseases are recorded. The existing systems of production organization do not always meet the requirements of the legislation to safety. The Federal Labour Inspectorate, Prosecutor's office and Trade Union organizations are constantly monitoring the concealment or misrepresentation of information about industrial accidents.

Materials and Methods. The statistics on occupational injuries is analyzed in terms of system analysis and synthesis, as well as correlation analysis. The tools of mathematical statistics and logic are used.

Research Result. The level of industrial injuries and occupational diseases gradually decreases at the enterprises with harmful and (or) dangerous working conditions. The problem of the reliability of the source data on injuries becomes more acute in this case. Management, owners, and sometimes affected employees are not interested in spreading accurate information about injuries associated with the performance of official duties. The situation is made worse by the lack of funding: first, companies do not have enough funds for labor protection measures; secondly, the management is trying to avoid fines. This is especially true for small businesses. Their turnover is lower, and, therefore, the shortage of funds that could be directed to labor protection is higher. In addition, small companies do not fill in Statistical Form No. 7 "Injuries". In addition, only selective monitoring of the state of occupational safety is applied to such organizations.

Discussion and Conclusions. The most often unfavorable from the point of safety situation is supported by the following factors: lack of funding; incorrect work schedule; participation of unskilled personnel in complex and dangerous production operations; operation of outdated or non-preventive equipment.

Taking into account the received data the organizational and economic mechanism can be created, which allows excluding corruptions of the reporting 

1. Samarskaya, N.A. Sostoyanie usloviy i okhrany truda v sovremennoy Rossii. [State of conditions and labor protection in modern Russia.] Ekonomika truda, 2017, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 209-22 (in Russian).

2. Molev, M.D., Stradanchenko, S.G., Maslennikov, S.A. Theoretical and experimental substantiation of construction regional security monitoring systems technospheric. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2015, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 6787–6790.

3. Gavrichenko, A.I. Professional’nye opas-nosti, riski i okhrana truda. [Occupational hazards, risks and occupational safety.] Chelovek i trud, 2012, no. 5, pp. 66-70 (in Russian).

4. Efremov, S.V. Upravlenie tekhnosfernoy bezopasnost’yu. [Technosphere safety manage-ment.] St. Petersburg, Izd-vo S.-Petersburg. gos. politekhn. un-ta, 2012, 46 p. (in Russian).

5. Fedorets, A.G. Okhrana truda —2015 i drugie interesnye voprosy professional’noy okhrany spetsial’nykh riskov ot bezopasnosti tru-da. [Labour protection — 2015 and other interest-ing questions of professional protection of special risks from occupational safety.] Moscow, Institut bezopasnosti truda, 2015, 136 p. (in Russian).

6. Socio-economic costs of accidents at work and work-related ill health. European Commis-sion. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Eurostat. 2011, 52 p. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ so-cial/file:/C:/Users/ User/Downloads/BenOsh_ Pub-lication_DEF.pdf.

7. Shchekina, E.V., Eremina, T.A. Analiz pro-izvodstvennogo travmatizma na mashinostroi-tel’nom predpriyatii "Rostovskiy pressovo-raskroyny zavod" za period s 2006 po 2016 god. [The analysis of industrial injury situation at the machine-building enterprise "Rostov press-cutting plant" over the period from 2006 to 2016.] Be-zopasnost’ prirodnykh i tekhnogennykh system, 2017, no. 4, pp. 9-24. Available at: http: //bps-journal.ru/upload/ iblock/f04/09_25.pdf (in Russian).

8. Rial-Gonzalez E. et al. Priorities for Occu-pational Safety and Health Research in the EU-25. Luxemburg, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2005, 85 p.

9. Spatar, E.V. Otsenka okhrany truda razlich-nymi metodami. [Estimation of labor protection by different methods.] Tekhnika. Tekhnologii. In-zhineriya. 2016, no. 1, pp. 5-9. Available at: https://moluch.ru/ th/8/archive/36/852/ (in Rus-sian).

10. Abramov, N.R. Upravlenie okhranoy truda s primeneniem autsorsinga. [Management of labor protection with outsourcing.] Bezopasnost’ i okhrana truda, 2011, no. 3, pp. 9-16 (in Russian).

11. Golik, V. et al. Metal deposits combined development experience. Metallurgical and Min-ing Industry, 2015, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 591–594.

12. Zanina, I.A., Chernyshenko, O.V. Ko-stromina, E.I. Rossiyskaya statistika proizvod-stvennogo travmatizma. [Russian statistics on oc-cupational injuries.] Actualscience, 2015, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 77-80 (in Russian).