Analysis and assessment of the safety level of port facilities using the example of a sulfur storage warehouse
https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-2-43-49
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with the problems of analysis and assessment of the safety level of hazardous production facilities of port facilities that have a negative impact on both the environment and the personnel working at the facility. Objects of this kind are referred to the first class of hazard; therefore, they require a comprehensive assessment of their resistance to emergencies in terms of the likelihood of their occurrence in specific industrial conditions.
Problem Statement. The objective of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the safety level of the most vulnerable areas of the technological process of port activities.
Theoretical Part. The results of a scheduled inspection of the AO “Ust-Donetsk Port” conducted by the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources were used as basic information.
Conclusion. Based on the calculation results, it was found that the probability of an emergency for the most dangerous scenario is 2.4×10-8 and corresponds to the acceptable risk zone.
About the Authors
L. E. Pustovaya
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pustovaya, Larisa E., Associate Professor, Department of Life Safety and Environmental Protection, Cand. Sci., Аassociate Professor
1, Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
V. A. Chebysheva
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chebysheva, Valeriya A., Master’s degree student, Department of Life Safety and Environmental Protection
1, Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
References
1. Bardyshev O. A., Bardyshev A. O. Obespechenie bezopasnosti pri perevalke sypuchikh gruzov v novykh morskikh terminalakh v Rossii [The security provision of bulk cargo handling at new sea terminals at Russia]. VESTNIK MANEB. 2019;24(1):5–11. (In Russ.)
2. Goncharova N. V. Obzor sovremennogo sostoyaniya tekhnicheskogo osnashcheniya rechnykh terminalov Rossii [Overview of the current state of technical equipment of river terminals in Russia]. Problemy ispol'zovaniya i innovatsionnogo razvitiya vnutrennikh vodnykh putey v basseynakh velikikh rek: tr. 19-go Mezhdunar. nauch.-prom. foruma "Velikie reki-2018" [Problems of the use and innovative development of inland waterways in the basins of great rivers: proc. of the 19-th International Scientific-Industrial Journal. forum "Great Rivers-2018"]. Nizhny Novgorod: Volga State University of Water Transport, 2018, iss. 7. 6 p. (In Russ.)
3. Meskhi B. Ch., Pustovaya L. E., Bogdanova I. V., Khlebunov S. A. Sovremennye problemy bezopasnosti: uchebnoe posobie [Modern safety problems: textbook]. Rostov-on-Don: DSTU Publishing house, 2011. 137 p. (In Russ.)
4. Pustovaya L. E., Meskhi B. Ch. Metody i pribory kontrolya okruzhayushchey sredy. Ekologicheskiy monitoring: uchebnoe posobie [Methods and devices for environmental monitoring. Environmental monitoring: textbook]. Rostov-on-Don: DSTU Publishing house, 2008. 218 p. (In Russ.)
5. Raanan R. et al. Elemental Sulfur Use and Associations with Pediatric Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms in an Agricultural Community (California, USA). Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125(8):0870071 087007-8. DOI: 10.1289/EHP528.
6. Zhang J. Factors influencing and a statistical method for describing dust explosion parameters: A review. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2018;56:386-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.09.005
7. Yanqiu Y.U. Research on explosion characteristics of sulfur dust and risk control of the explosion. Procedia Engineering. 2014;84:449 459. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.455.
8. Min-Chi Wei, Yu-Chi Cheng, Yong-Ye Lin, Wen-Kai Kuo, Chi-Min Shu Applications of dust explosion hazard and disaster prevention technology. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2020;68:104304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104304.
9. Esipov Yu. V., Pustovaya L. E., Cheremisin A. I. Metody rascheta pokazatelei bezopasnosti i riska: uchebnoe posobie [Methods for calculating safety and risk indicators: textbook]. Rostov-on-Don: DSTU Publishing house, 2016. 87 p. (In Russ.)
10. Solovyeva V. G. K voprosu ob upravlenii riskami sovremennogo rechnogo porta [On the issue of risk management of a modern river port]. Modern High Technologies. Regional Application. 2012;3(31):59–66. (In Russ.)
11. Khoroshun E. G., Samchuk-Khabarova N. Ya., Esipov Yu. V. Razrabotka metodiki otsenivaniya granits priemlemogo professional'nogo riska [Development of the Methodology for the Limits of Acceptable Occupational Risk]. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019;6:86–89. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-6-86-89. (In Russ.)
12. Kukhta A. I., Mamatchenko N. S. Kompleksnyy metod otsenki stepeni professional'nykh riskov na predpriyatii [Integrated method of occupational risk degree assessment at the enterprise]. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2019;1:18–27. DOI: 10.23947/2541-9129-2019-1-18-27 (In Russ.)
13. Esipov Yu. V., Shchekina E. V., Maslenskiy V. V. Primenenie logiko-vozmozhnostnogo metoda dlya ekspress-otsenki veroyatnosti proisshestviya v mnogofaktornoy tekhnicheskoy sisteme staleliteinogo tsekha [Application of logical-and-possibility method for rapid assessment of accident probability in a multivariable technical system of the steel foundry]. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2018;3–4:52–63. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pustovaya L.E., Chebysheva V.A. Analysis and assessment of the safety level of port facilities using the example of a sulfur storage warehouse. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2021;(2):43-49. https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-2-43-49
Views:
271
Email this article 