Preview

Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems

Advanced search

Development of a Computational Complex for Fire Hazard Assessment of Production Facilities, Taking into Account Their Characteristics

https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2025-9-3-185-195

EDN: SBQHNQ

Abstract

Introduction. Every year in the Russian Federation, approximately five thousand fires occur at production facilities, causing damage estimated in billions of rubles. To reduce the number of fires and minimize damage, work is underway to improve the methodology for calculating the number and equipment of fire protection units created to extinguish fires and conduct emergency rescue operations in organizations. This methodology was approved by Order of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia dated October 15, 2021 No. 700 (hereinafter referred to as the Methodology). In the scientific literature on the analysis of fire hazards in industrial facilities in various sectors of the economy, there is a lack of a comprehensive indicator for fire hazard assessment of enterprises, which would take into account their technical and economic characteristics and industry affiliation. The aim of this study is to develop a dimensionless computing system describing the state of fire hazard of industrial facilities, taking into account their characteristic features. The developed complex was used in the formation of approaches to substantiate the number and technical equipment of facility-based fire protection units.

Materials and Methods. The analysis of statistical data on the number of fires, number of deaths and injuries, as well as the material damage caused by fires at production facilities in various economic sectors, was carried out using information from the Federal State Information System "Federal Database 'Fires'". To determine technical, economic and operational characteristics of enterprises with facility-based fire protection units, a survey was conducted using a questionnaire that collected information from 726 production facilities. Technical and economic characteristics of these facilities were studied, including: the area of land and buildings, number of employees, the mass of fire-hazardous, fire-explosive and explosive technological environments, the area of buildings and structures classified into certain categories of explosion and fire hazard, the number of fires at the enterprise, etc.

Results. A dimensionless Uпо computing system has been developed that characterizes the fire hazard level of industrial facilities. The distribution of values of the Uпо complex for production facilities where fire protection units have been established has been constructed, and the parameters of the resulting distribution have been determined. The criteria for classifying a production facility according to its fire hazard level have been established. The values of the fire hazard indicator for economic sectors have been calculated. Ferrous metallurgy (Uпо = 0.77), mechanical engineering and metalworking (0.73), non-ferrous metallurgy (0.70), and fuel industry (0.68) fell into the category of high fire hazard. The paper provides an example of calculating the fire hazard level for an electric power company.

Discussion. When determining the number and location of fire protection units, as well as the number of personnel and technical equipment, it is important to consider the level of fire risk at the production facility. An analysis of the distribution of values of the Uпо complex showed that it followed a normal distribution with an average value of m = 0.47 and a standard deviation of σ = 0.19. This meant that industries such as ferrous metallurgy and mechanical engineering had a higher level of fire risk compared to the electric power industry, which was classified as medium. The proposed method allows for an effective assessment of fire risk across different sectors of the economy.

Conclusion. The results obtained were used to develop a new version of the Methodology for calculating the number and technical equipment of fire protection units, created to extinguish fires and carry out emergency rescue operations in organizations. This methodology was approved by Order No. 700 of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia dated October 15, 2021. The use of the developed complex will allow for a more accurate consideration of the specific characteristics of the production facility when determining fire protection resources.

About the Author

A. A. Kondashov
All-Russian Research Institute of Fire Protection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Kondashov - Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Leading Researcher of the All-Russian Research Institute of Fire Protection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters.

12, VNIIPO, Balashikha, mkr., 143903

Scopus ID 6604071787



References

1. Smirnov AV. On Fire Safety Management Structure at a Typical Chemical Industry Facility. In: Problems of Technosphere Safety: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists. 2017;(6):426–430. (In Russ.)

2. Fedorov VA. Assessment of Fire and Explosion Safety of Metallurgical Industry Enterprises in Terms of Production Related to the Handling of Combustible Dust. Fire and Technosphere Safety: Problems and Ways of Improvement. 2021;3(10):456–460. (In Russ.)

3. Moroń W, Ferens W. Analysis of Fire and Explosion Hazards Caused by Industrial Dusts with a High Content of Volatile Matter. Fuel. 2024;355:129363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129363

4. Polyanin AV. Increasing the Level of Safety for Participants of Fire Extinguishing at the Facilities of the Metallurgical Industry. In: Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference “Scientific Research 2022”, Penza, September 15, 2022. Penza: Science and Education (IP Gulyaev G.Yu.); 2022. P. 30–32. (In Russ.)

5. Kornyukhin IS, Ermilov AV. Analysis of Statistical Data on Fires in the Woodworking Industry. In: Proceedings “Current Issues of Firefighting”, Ivanovo, May 15, 2020. 2020. Ivanovo: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ivanovo Fire and Rescue Academy of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters”; P. 68–73. (In Russ.)

6. Kundysheva MV. Analysis of Sources of Danger in a Woodworking Enterprise. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “The Arctic: Modern Approaches to Industrial and Environmental Safety in the Oil and Gas Sector” Tyumen, November 29, 2023. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University; 2024. P. 109–112. (In Russ.)

7. Aleshkov MV, Pushkin DS, Kolbasin AA. Features of Development and Suppression of Fires on Objects of Power. Technosphere Security Technologies. 2010;(3(31));9. (In Russ.)

8. Maltsev AV. Analysis of the Causes of Fires at Oil Refining Facilities. Fire Safety: Problems and Prospects.2017;1(8):278–280. (In Russ.)

9. Pshenichnyi DS. Analysis of the causes and Methods of Extinguishing Fires at Gas Industry Facilities. In: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference of Young Researchers “Actual Problems of Construction, Housing and Communal Services and Technosphere Safety”, Volgograd, April 24–29, 2023. Volgograd: Volgograd State Technical University; 2023. P. 260–262. (In Russ.)

10. Fedorov AV, Ospanov KK, Lomaev EN, Aleshkov AM, Mintsaev MSh. Statistical and Causal Factors Analysis of Accidents at Oil Refining and Petrochemical Industry of Russia and Kazakhstan. Technosphere Security Technologies. 2021;(2(92)):156–168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25257/TTS.2021.2.92.156-168

11. Kalach AV, Cherepakhin AM, Sushko EA, Kalach EV, Sysoeva TP. The Dangerous Fire Factors Formation the on an Oil and Gas Complex Objects When Using the Combustible Environment on the Tetrachlormethane Basis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020;459:042046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/459/4/042046

12. Gvozdev E. Development of an Integrated Safety Sistem for Production Facilities: the Problem Statement and the Proposed Solution. Reliability: Theory & Applications. 2024;19(1(77)):474–487. https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2024-177-474-487

13. Aldiyansyah Aldiyansyah, Al Amin Siharis, Abriansyah Abriansyah, Fitrani Amin, Aqsal Ramadhan. Kegiatan Sosialisasi Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Pada Tambang Batu Gamping di PT. Diamond Alfa Propertindo Kabupaten Buton Tengah. Anoa: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Fakultas Teknik. 2023;2(1):58–62. https://doi.org/10.51454/anoa.v2i01.453

14. Savelyev AP, Glotov SV, Chugunov MN, Enaleeva SA. Fire Safety at Medium-Size Machine-Building Facilities. Russian Engineering Research. 2022;42(4):373–375. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X22040268

15. Marakhov PA, Poroshin AA, Streltsov OV, Kondashov AA, Bobrinev EV, Udavtsova EY. Formation of an Information Base for Calculating the Resource Provision of Fire Protection to Protect Organizations from Fires. Modern Problems of Civil Protection. 2024;(3(52)):22–29. (In Russ.) URL: https://ntp.edufire37.ru/uploads/2024/09/%D0%A1%D0%9F%D0%93%D0%97_352_2024.pdf (accessed: 11.05.2025).


Review

For citations:


Kondashov A.A. Development of a Computational Complex for Fire Hazard Assessment of Production Facilities, Taking into Account Their Characteristics. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2025;9(3):185-195. https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2025-9-3-185-195. EDN: SBQHNQ

Views: 115


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9129 (Online)