Comparative analysis of engineering solutions against the shift of the upper part of the ladder when performing work at height
https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-3-33-39
Abstract
Introduction. Modern construction is characterized by work at a height using stairs. The article presents various engineering solutions aimed at preventing injuries during such work.
Problem Statement. The objective of this study is to compare the available engineering solutions aimed at preventing the upper part of the ladder from shifting when performing work at height.
Theoretical Part. The work shows the ranking of the existing technical means that allow fixing the upper part of the ladder on the surface of the support and reducing the risk of sliding the upper part of the ladder on the support. It is shown that the structure fixed to the support has the least risk in ensuring the safety of work at height.
Conclusion. The article defines the most promising directions of development of technical solutions against shifting the upper part of the ladder.
About the Authors
V. A. Senchenko
PAO Rostelecom Volgograd branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senchenko, Vladimir A., Labor protection senior specialist
app 142, 7, Donetskaya st., Volgograd, 400066
T. T. Kaverzneva
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; St. Petersburg National Research Academic University of Zh.I. Alfyorov of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kaverzneva, Tatyana T., Associate professor, Higher School of Technosphere Safety, Ph. D., Associate professor
29, Politekhnicheskaya st, St-Petersburg, 195251
S. L. Pushenko
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pushenko, Sergey L., Head, Department of Process Safety, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor
1, Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
E. V. Staseva
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Staseva, Elena V., Associate professor, Department of Process Safety, Cand.Sci., Associate professor
1, Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
N. V. Rumyantseva
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rumyantseva, Nina V., Associate professor, Higher school of Technosphere Safety, Ph. D., Associate professor
29, Politekhnicheskaya st, St-Petersburg, 195251
References
1. Senchenko V. A., Karaush S. A., Kaverzneva T. T. Safety precautions for works on gable roofs. Construction and Geotechnics. 2017;8(2):5–14. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9826/2017.2.01 (In Russ.)
2. Hsiao H., Simeonova P., Pizatella T. et al. Extension-ladder safety: Solutions and knowledge gaps. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2008;38(11–12.):959–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.011
3. Plinera E. M., Seo Na Jin, Beschorner K. E. Factors affecting fall severity from a ladder: Impact of climbing direction, gloves, gender and adaptation. Applied Ergonomics. 2017;60:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.011.
4. Socias C. M., Chaumont Menéndez C. K., Collins J. W., Simeonov P. Occupational ladder fall injuries - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(18):341–346. PMID: 24759655; PMCID: PMC4584774
5. Häkkinen K. K., Pesonen J., Rajamäki E Experiments on safety in the use of portable ladders. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 1988;10(1):1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6349(88)90002-8
6. Chien-Chi Chang, Chang Wen-Ruey, Matz Simon The effects of straight ladder setup and usage on ground reaction forces and friction requirements during ascending and descending. Safety Science. 2005;43(7):469–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.08.002.
7. Senchenko V. A., Pushenko S. L., Staseva E. V., Glumov E. A. Nasadka na lestnitsu s ankernoy tochkoy [Ladder attachment with anchor point]. Patent Russian Federation 185193, E06C 7/46, no. 2018132217, 2018. 5 p. (In Russ.)
8. Senchenko V. A., Lelikov G. D., Glumov E. A. Nasadka na lestnitsu [Ladder attachment]. Patent Russian Federation 184480, E06C 7/46, no. 2018131525, 2018. 3 p. (In Russ.)
9. Senchenko V. A., Pushenko S. L., Staseva E. V., Kaverzneva T. T., Skripnik I. L., Voronin S. V. Nasadka na lestnitsu [Ladder attachment]. Patent Russian Federation 193480, E06C 7/46, no. 2019129116, 2019. (In Russ.)
10. Petrashkevich V. V., Mikheev P. A., Petrashkevich A. V., Smirnov A. P. Nasadka na lestnitsu [Ladder attachment]. Patent Russian Federation 202693, F03B 13/18, no. 2020138830, 2021. (In Russ.)
11. Senchenko V. A., Karaush S. A., Kaverzneva T. T., Kireeva L. A. Nasadka na lestnitsu [Ladder attachment]. Patent Russian Federation 189558, E06C 7/46, no. 2019100332, 2019. (In Russ.)
12. Senchenko V. A., Lelikov G. D., Senchenko O. A. Nasadka na lestnitsu s ankernym ustroistvom [Ladder attachment with anchor device]. Patent Russian Federation 196601, E06C 7/46, no. 2019127419, 2020. (In Russ.)
13. Senchenko V. A., Pushenko S. L., Staseva E. V., Svetlakova A. Yu., Ulyanov A. I. Nasadka na lestnitsu [Ladder attachment]. Patent Russian Federation 198464, E06S 7/46, no. 2020114763, 2020. (In Russ.)
14. Senchenko V. A., Kaverzneva T. T., Karaush S. A., Skripnik I. L., Rumyantseva N. V. Nasadka na lestnitsu s usilennym krepleniem za lestnitsu i ankernym ustroistvom [Ladder attachment with reinforced ladder attachment and anchor device]. Patent Russian Federation 202731, E06C 7/46, no. 2020120196, 2021. (In Russ.)
15. Shatina A. V. Evolyutsiya dvizheniya mekhanicheskikh sistem s beskonechnym chislom stepenei svobody: avtoref. dis…. dokt. fiz.-mat. nauk [Evolution of motion of mechanical systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom: author’s abstract.]. Moscow, 2007. 34 p. (In Russ.)
16. Kagan M. L., Antonov V. I., Belov V. A. Peculiarities of dry friction. Vestnik MGSU. 2012;11:183–190. http://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2012.11.183-190 (In Russ.)
17. Minko, V. M. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie v okhrane truda. Kaliningrad: FGOU VPO KSTU Publishing house, 2008. 248 p. (In Russ.)
18. Sazonova A., Kopytenkova O. I., Staseva E. Risk of pathologies when exposed to fine dust in the construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 21, Construction - The Formation of Living Environment, 2018. p. 032039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/3/032039
19. Senchenko V. A., Pushenko S. L., Staseva E. V. Concept of technical security measures when performing high-rise works on roofs of buildings in the conditions of the Arctic north. Bulletin of Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Series: Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2018;51(70):178–185. (In Russ.)
20. Skrypnik I. L., Ksenofontov Yu. G., Kaverzneva T. T. et al. Assessment of technical level of new, promising models of equipment at the stage of their development in modern engineering practice. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;862:042031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/862/4/042031
21. Tarkhov D. A., Kaverzneva T. T., Idrisova D. I. Analiz prichin tyazhelogo i smertel'nogo travmatizma na stroitel'noy ploshchadke. Mining informational and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2015;S60- 2:244–253. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Senchenko V.A., Kaverzneva T.T., Pushenko S.L., Staseva E.V., Rumyantseva N.V. Comparative analysis of engineering solutions against the shift of the upper part of the ladder when performing work at height. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2021;(3):33-39. https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-3-33-39
Views:
187
Email this article 