The state of fire alarm systems at protection facilities from 2016 to 2020
https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-3-40-46
Abstract
Introduction. The article presents the results of studies on assessing the performance of fire alarm systems in buildings (structures) for various purposes in the period from 2016 to 2020. The analysis of the regulatory framework and the results of previous studies in the field of assessing the effectiveness of fire automatics, including at industrial and residential facilities, is presented. This article explores other types of protected objects.
Problem Statement. The objective of the research is to study the efficiency of functioning of fire alarm systems.
Theoretical Part. Based on the statistical data for the period from 2016 to 2020 about fires and their consequences, the operability of fire alarms in buildings (structures) for various purposes has been investigated. The social (the number of dead and injured people) and economic (direct material damage) consequences of fires when the fire alarm systems are triggered are analyzed.
Conclusion. The results of the study of the operability of the fire alarm in general indicate an increase in the efficiency of its operation compared to the period up to 2016. At the same time, the number of protected objects is characterized by rather low values (less than 50 %) of response efficiency indicators and significant socio-economic consequences of fires.
About the Authors
A. A. Poroshin
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fire Protection of EMERCOM of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Poroshin, Aleksey A., Head, Automatic Fire Alarm Department, Research Center for Automatic Fire Detection and Extinguishing Systems, Cand.Sci.
12, VNIIPO mcr. dstr., Balashikha, Moscow region, 143903
A. A. Kondashov
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fire Protection of EMERCOM of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kondashov, Andrey A., Leading researcher, Department of Fire Protection Resources and Psychological Research, Research Center for Organizational and Managerial Problems of Fire Safety, Cand.Sci.
12, VNIIPO mcr. dstr., Balashikha, Moscow region, 143903
V. I. Sibirko
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fire Protection of EMERCOM of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sibirko, Vitaliy I., Head, Sector of the Fire Statistics Department, Research Center for Organizational and Managerial Problems of Fire Safety
12, VNIIPO mcr. dstr., Balashikha, Moscow region, 143903
V. S. Goncharenko
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fire Protection of EMERCOM of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Goncharenko, Valentina S., Researcher, Department of Fire Statistics, Research Center for Organizational and Managerial Problems of Fire Safety
12, VNIIPO mcr. dstr., Balashikha, Moscow region, 143903
References
1. Statistika pozharov za 2016–2020 gody [Fire statistics for 2016-2020]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/statistikapozaro/home/rezultaty-rascetov/operativnye-dannye-po-pozaram (Accessed 29.03.2021) (In Russ.)
2. Lomaev E. N., Fedorov A. V., Gaplaev A. A.-B. Obosnovanie primeneniya funktsional'noparametricheskogo podkhoda k otsenke nadezhnosti sistem pozharnoy avtomatiki v protsesse ekspluatatsii. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015;10–2(19):84–86. (In Russ.)
3. Putilin I. P. Problemy obespecheniya i kontrolya rabotosposobnosti pozharnyi avtomatiki [Problems of ensuring and monitoring the operability of fire automation]. Algoritm bezopasnosti. 2018;6:30–33. (In Russ.)
4. Topolskiy N. G., Samarin I. V., Strogonov A. Yu. Model of evaluation of comprehensive safety in the APCS with the use of diagnostic fire detectors for the construction of automated systems of support of management of fire and explosion safety. Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018;27(11):15–22. (In Russ.)
5. Gushchin Ya. S. Kolichestvennye otsenki nadezhnosti signalizatsii na proizvodstvennykh ob"ektakh [Quantitative assessments of the reliability of alarm system at production facilities]. Sistemy bezopasnosti-2017: materialy 26 Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii [Safety Systems-2017: proc. of the 26th International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow, 2017. p. 364–367. (In Russ.)
6. Fedorov A. V., Lomaev E. N., Gaplaev A. A.-B., Toktarkhan E. O. Rabotosposobnost' sistem pozharnoy avtomatiki na promyshlennykh ob"ektakh v 2005–2014 godakh [Efficiency of fire automation systems at industrial facilities in 2005-2014]. Pozhary i chrezvychaynye situatsii: predotvrashchenie, likvidatsiya. 2016;2:73–76. (In Russ.).
7. Sokolov S. V., Kostyuchenko D. V. Effectiveness of fire automation on fires in homes. Fire and Explosion Safety. 2014;23(6):70–75. (In Russ.)
8. Kostyuchenko D. V. Aktual'nost' primeneniya sredstv pozharnoy avtomatiki v zhilykh domakh [The relevance of the use of fire automation tools in residential buildings]. Pozharotushenie: problemy, tekhnologii, innovatsii: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Firefighting: problems, technologies, innovations: proc. of the international scientific and practical conference]. Moscow, 2014. p. 16–18. (In Russ.)
9. Sokolov S. V., Fedorov A. V., Kostyuchenko D. V. Obespechenie pozharnoybezopasnosti s pomoshch'yu sredstv pozharnoy avtomatiki v mnogokvartirnykh zhilykh domakh pri realizatsii regional'nykh programm po ikh kapital'nomu remontu [Ensuring fire safety with the help of fire automation equipment in multi-apartment residential buildings during the implementation of regional programs for total buildings renovation]. Pozhary i chrezvychainye situatsii: predotvrashchenie, likvidatsiya. 2015;1:41–47. (In Russ.)
10. Goryachenkov M. S. Pozhary v mnogokvartirnykh domakh: kak perelomit' situatsiyu? [Fires in apartment buildings: how to turn the tide?]. Sistemy bezopasnosti. 2019;1:106–108. Available from: http://lib.secuteck.ru/articles2/bypub/ss-1-2019). (In Russ.)
11. Poroshin A. A., Kondashov A. A., Sibirko V. I. Otsenka rabotosposobnosti sistem pozharnoy signalizatsii na ob"ektakh zhilogo fonda za period s 2016 po 2020 god [Assessment of the operability of fire alarm systems at residential facilities for the period from 2016 to 2020]. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti. 2021;1(91):19–32. (In Russ.)
12. Poroshin A. A., Kondashov A. A., Sibirko V. I. Efficiency Assessment of Fire Alarm Systems Actuation at the Production Facilities for the Period 2016–2020. Industrial Safety. 2021;4:32–37. (In Russ.)
13. O formirovanii elektronnykh baz dannykh ucheta pozharov i ikh posledstviy: prikaz MChS Rossii ot 24.12.2018 no. 625 [On the formation of electronic databases for accounting for fires and their consequences: Order of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia No. 625 of 24.12.2018]. Elektronnyy fond pravovykh i normativnotekhnicheskikh dokumentov. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/552366056 (Accessed 29.03.2021). (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Poroshin A.A., Kondashov A.A., Sibirko V.I., Goncharenko V.S. The state of fire alarm systems at protection facilities from 2016 to 2020. Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems. 2021;(3):40-46. https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2021-3-40-46
Views:
279
Email this article 