Comparative analysis of the impact of objects of traditional and alternative energy on the environment

Introduction. Active withdrawal of energy raw materials from the subsoil, as well as technogenic impact from energy sources based on traditional fuel, lead to irreversible environmental consequences. To minimize this impact, it is necessary to start from two main conditions: the search for alternative energy sources and the improvement of the existing ones.
Problem Statement. The objective of this study is a comparative analysis of energy facilities in order to identify the plant that has the greatest negative impact on the environment.
Theoretical part. The comparative analysis of various energy production systems reflects the ecological and economic components of each. For example, a thermal power plant (TPP), a nuclear power plant (NPP) and a wind power plant (WPP) are considered. The negative impact on the environment is mainly exerted on the atmospheric air, in connection with which the data on the amount of pollutants are considered. Also, a modified Leopold matrix was constructed for an expert assessment of the mentioned stations.
Conclusions. The results of the analysis show that among the considered power plants, the wind power plant is the most environmentally friendly and favorable for the health of the population.

1. Leskina A. N., Goshtynar A. S., Bizhanov S. A. Zhiznennyy tsikl ob'ektov stroitel'stva i upravleniya nedvizhimost'yu. Simvol nauki. 2016;1:132–137 (In Russ.)

2. Krylov D. A. «Toxicity» of coal-fired heat and power generation. Mining Industry. 2016;129(5). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/toksichnost-ugolnoy-teplo-elektrogeneratsii (accessed: 29.06.2021). (In Russ.)

3. Galiulin R. V., Galiulina R. A. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Territory of Chelyabinsk upon Coal Combustion. Solid Fuel Chemistry. 2013;2:62—64. (In Russ.)

4. Yadutov V. V., Petrov T. I., Zatsarinnaya Yu. N. Vozdeystvie TES na okruzhayushchuyu sredu. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2013;19(16):78–79. (In Russ.)

5. Rolik Yu. A. Upravlenie innovatsionnymi vetroenergeticheskimi proektami. Author’s thesis. Riga: Transport and Telecommunication Institute, 2008. 186 p. (In Russ.)

6. Gornostay A. V., Rolik Yu. A., Bulekov A. V. Ekologicheskie aspekty vozdeystviya vetroenergeticheskikh ustanovok na okruzhayushchuyu sredu. Nauka — obrazovaniyu, proizvodstvu, ekonomike: materialy 14-i Mezhdunar. nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii. Minsk, 2016;1:63. (In Russ.)

7. Shavlis A. K. Vliyanie vozobnovlyaemykh istochnikov energii na okruzhayushchuyu sredu. Aktual'nye problemy energetiki: materialy studencheskoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii. Minsk, 2018. p. 540–541. Available from: https://rep.bntu.by/handle/data/51583 (accessed: 15.06.2021). (In Russ.)

8. Guzhavina T. A., Lastovkina D. A., Ozerova O. Yu. Life Quality in the Estimates of Region’s Population. Problems of territory's development. 2016;2(82):98–111. (In Russ.)

9. Krylov D. A. Otsenki udel'nykh vybrosov SO2 i NOX v atmosferu dlya sushchestvuyushchikh elektrostantsiy Rossii, szhigayushchikh kuznetskiy i kansko-achinskiy ugli, s uchetom vsey energeticheskoy tsepochki: ot dobychi etikh ugley do potrebleniya ikh na TES. Preprint Mezhdun. tsentra po ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti Minatoma Rossii. Moscow, 2001. p. 40. (In Russ.)

10. Abalkina I. L., Demin V. F., Novikov S. M. et al. Ekonomicheskie parametry otsenki riska dlya rascheta ushcherba, obuslovlennogo vozdeystviem na zdorov'e naseleniya raznykh faktorov. Issues of risk analysis. 2005;2(2):132–138. (In Russ.)

11. Krylov D. A., Sidorova G. P. Radioactivity of Coal and Ash-Slag TPP Wastes. Atomic Energy. 2013;114(1):43–47. (In Russ.)

12. Bubenchikov A. A., Demidova N. G., Malkov N. G. Ekologicheskaya ekspertiza vetroenergeticheskoy ustanovki. Molodoy uchenyy. 2016;28–2(132):31–35. (In Russ.)

13. Beznosov V. N., Suzdaleva A. L., El-Shair Kh. I. A. Otsenka ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti ob’ektov vetroenergetiki. Enegy fresh. 2011;3–4:37–43. (In Russ.)

14. Ryzhenkov M. A. Ekologicheskaya otsenka vozdeystviya VES na okruzhayushchuyu sredu v protsesse ekspluatatsii. Advances in Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 2011;25(10):28–32. (In Russ.)

15. Kotelenko S. V., Ryabov A. S. Preimushchestva i nedostatki netraditsionnoy energetiki. News of the Tula state university. Technical sciences. 2018;12:84–88. (In Russ.)